Civil Rights Cases
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Raul Labrador, et al
as 23-35518
Plaintiff / Appellee: PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, On Behalf of Itself, It's Staff, Physicians and Patients, CAITLIN GUSTAFSON, On Behalf of Herself and Her Patients and DARIN WEYHRICH, On Behalf of Himself and His Patients
Defendant / Appellant: RAUL R. LABRADOR, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Defendant: MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF NURSING, In Their Official Capacities, COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, In Their Official Capacities and others
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky et al v. Labrador et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Caitlin Gustafson and Darin Weyhrich
Defendant: Raul Labrador, Members of the Idaho State Board of Medicine, Idaho State Board of Nursing and others
Amicus Curiae: St. Luke's Health System Ltd., State of Arizona, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Stanley v. Jennings, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00464
Plaintiff: Sarah Stanley
Defendant: Gary Lee Jennings, Laurie Baird Gaffney, Jeffery W. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deng v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00539
Plaintiff: Ngong L. Deng
Defendant: Judge Ann Bailey Smith, Judge Barry Willett, Judge Erica Lee Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-55680
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04147
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?