Cases 1 - 10 of 35
AYALA v. CAFE QUATTRO AT SIMPSON, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03201
Plaintiff:
MERCEDES AYALA
Defendant:
BALA POINTE CAFE, INC. and CAFE QUATTRO AT SIMPSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GARFIELD PROPERTY LLC v. ERUS HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00624
Defendant:
ARLYN B. FLORKEY, ERUS HOLDINGS, LLC, BALA LEMAK and others
Plaintiff:
GARFIELD PROPERTY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
PAYNE v. METROPOLITAN BALA APARTMENTS et al
as 2:2023cv05054
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN BALA APARTMENTS and METROPOLITAN MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7401 Clean Air Act
PAYNE v. MANSION AT BALA
as 2:2023cv03408
Plaintiff:
DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH and EDWARD HAYWOOD PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
GRACIELA CHRISTLIEB, ANITA J MURRY and MANSION AT BALA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIU CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 2:2022cv04936
Plaintiff:
NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LIU CONSTRUCTION, LLC and BALA SPRING ESTATE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BALAS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00596
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BALAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BALAS v. STANISH et al
as 3:2021cv00466
Defendant:
Adams, Pam Smith, KARAN FEATHER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN BALAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
