Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Tyra v. Ball
as 2:2024cv01104
Respondent:
Denita Ball
Petitioner:
Christopher Titus Tyra, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cotton v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv01032
Defendant:
Denita Ball, Officer Bailey, Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Michael M Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Human Rights Defense Center v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, Jane/John Doe 1-10 and Milwaukee County
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nash v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00890
Defendant:
Denita Ball, Ron Lagosh, Earnell Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Monica D Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson v. Ball
as 2:2024cv00696
Respondent:
Sheriff Denita Ball
Petitioner:
Timothy Luther Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McElrath v. Ball
as 2:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Donald Lee McElrath
Respondent:
Denita R Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nash v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Monica D Nash
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Sheriff, Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office, Milwaukee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Werling v. Ball
as 2:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Nicholas Scott Werling and Lil Sippy
Respondent:
Denita R Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Cortez A Jones
Defendant:
Hannah Alexander, Randoll Wilborn, Brendt A Van Wagoner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
