Cases 11 - 20 of 409
Ballard v. Global Lending Services LLC
as 1:2023cv05461
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ballard
Defendant:
Global Lending Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ballard v. City of Wetumpka (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Stacey E. Ballard
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21263
Plaintiff:
LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13536
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FULTON BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08616
Plaintiff:
SUNITA BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parsons v. Changco
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Vernon Ballard Parsons, III
Defendant:
Marife Joyno Changco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
