Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Eric Rich v. Daniel Hersl
as 23-6775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC DEANDRE RICH
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIEL HERSL, Individually and as a police officer for Baltimore City Police Dept.
Bowles v. Hersl et al
as 1:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bowles
Defendant:
Officer DANIEL HERSL, John E. Burns, Jr., Stephen Romey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Holden v. Giordano et al
as 1:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Alex Holden
Defendant:
Jason Giordano, Jimmy Shetterly, Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pauling v. Hendrix et al
as 1:2020cv02211
Defendant:
Wayne Jenkins, Dean Palmere, Evodio Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Pauling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Rayam et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Dean Palmere, John Clewell, Thomas Allers and others
Plaintiff:
Sherman Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Hersl et al
as 1:2019cv02240
Defendant:
Dep. Police Comm. Dean Palmere, Major Ian Dombrowski, Officer Kevin Fassl and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Hersl et al
as 1:2019cv01981
Defendant:
Wayne Jenkins, Daniel Hersl, Momodu Gondo and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2018cv00782
Plaintiff:
Dameon Shaw
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Brandon Echevarria, Dexter Nazareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pack v. Baltimore City Police Dept.
as 1:2009cv02223
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Pack
Defendant:
Baltimore City Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
