Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01207
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muniz v. Bane et al
as 8:2014cv03232
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael Muniz
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Defendant:
L. Jesse Bane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brodt v. County of Harford et al
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Defendant:
County of Harford , Harford County District Court, Harford County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRODT v. COUNTY OF HARFORD et al
as 1:2014cv05017
Plaintiff:
Ronald Howard Brodt, Sr.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HARFORD, Harford County District Court, Harford County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison et al v. Harford County, Maryland et al
as 1:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Madison , Moses P. Madison , Annie Madison and others
Defendant:
Harford County, Maryland , Jesse Bane , Flemmens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2011cv03747
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Brown
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Jesse Bane and Allan Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackerman et al v. ExxonMobil Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv03442
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ackerman , Roxanna M. Guinan , Jeffrey Guinan and others
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation and John R. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01826
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Madison et al v. Harford County, MD et al
as 1:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Madison , Moses P. Madison , Kim Satchell and others
Defendant:
Harford County, MD , Sheriff Jesse Bane , Deputy John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
