Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
SHAH v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
as 3:2023cv23421
Plaintiff: PETER SHAH
Defendant: STATE BANK OF INDIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Thomas v. Thomas
as 1:2023cv06531
Petitioner: State Bank of India
Plaintiff: Aleena Thomas
Defendant: Tintu Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Arun Bhattacharya v. State Bank of India
as 22-2734
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYA
Defendant / Appellee: STATE BANK OF INDIA
WCT Inc. v. Republic of India et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06340
Plaintiff: WCT Inc.
Defendant: Republic of India, Ministry of External Affairs and The Embassy of India Washington, D.C.
Nominal Defendant: State Bank of India, New York Branch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Bhattacharya v. Khara et al
as 1:2020cv07741
Defendant: State Bank of India and Dinesh Kumar Khara
Plaintiff: Arun Kumar Bhattacharya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04698
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Bhattacharya v. Chairman, State Bank of India We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03361
Plaintiff: Arun Kumar Bhattacharya
Defendant: Chairman, State Bank of Inida and Chairman, State Bank of India
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Doe
as 1:2020cv03358
Defendant: State Bank Of India
Plaintiff: Arun Kumar Bhattacharya and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04169
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
FORMATION TEXTILES LLC v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP et al
as 2:2020cv01811
Defendant: EY RESTRUCTURING LLP, ERNST & YOUNG LLP, BANK OF BARODA and others
Plaintiff: FORMATION TEXTILES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?