Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Zahmoul v. NBH Bank
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Nadia Zahmoul
Defendant:
Bank of Jackson Hole a division of NBH Bank doing business as Bank of Jackson Hole and NBH Bank doing business as Bank of Jackson Hole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 21-8031
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLEEN LANE, DAVID W. PERINO, PATRICIA E. LANE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 0:2021cv00050
Defendant:
John Smiley, Holland & Hart, LLP, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00209
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00205
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16637
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 2:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Colleen Lane, Charles Hingle, Bank of Jackson Hole and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Friedman v. Bank of Jackson Hole, et al
as 20-16026
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BARNEY, JOHN SMILEY, LINDQUIST & VENNUM, LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD FRIEDMAN
Plimpton v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 3:2020cv00323
Defendant:
John Smiley, Robert M. Lane, Holland & Hart, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plimpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson Hole Bank Fraud Litigation Trust v. Bank of Jackson Hole et al
as 2:2019cv01054
Defendant:
Colleen Lane, John Smiley, Charles Hingle and others
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hole Bank Fraud Litigation Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
