Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Susewind, et al.
as 24-2562
Plaintiff:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant:
KELLY SUSEWIND, in his official capacity as the Director of the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, BARBARA BAKER, in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission, MOLLY LINVILLE, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission and others
Wild Fish Conservancy et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2024cv05296
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy and Wild Salmon Rivers d/b/a The Conservation Angler
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, Department of Commerce and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Larry Carpenter, Donald McIsaac, Molly Linville and others
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife et al
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Larry Carpenter, Robert Kehoe, Donald McIsaac and others
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Salvaggio et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv04253
Plaintiff:
Sandra Adkins, Jimmy Turner, Roberto Balderas and others
Defendant:
Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc., Monsanto Company and Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 2:2014cv01617
Plaintiff:
George R Baker and Barbara Baker
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Palo Alto University, Inc., et al
as 5:2013cv00546
Plaintiff:
Barbara Baker
Defendant:
Palo Alto University, Inc., , PGSP, Inc., and Saybrook University Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
