Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Primous v. United States Attorney General James et al
as 6:2024cv06143
Plaintiff:
Hazel Primous
Defendant:
James Kennedy, Jr., Trini Ross, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cano v. Underwood et al
as 1:2019cv05687
Respondent:
Cynthia Brann, Joseph Fucito, Darcel Denise Clark and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Hiram Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Jones v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2019cv00025
Defendant:
Dr. Tankerslery, Danielle Tope, Patricia M. Bordonaro and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asensio et al v. DiFiore et al
as 1:2018cv10933
Defendant:
Janet DiFiore, Emilie Marie Bosak, Adetokunbo O. Fasanya and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel P. Asensio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Griffin et al
as 1:2018cv05568
Respondent:
Thomas R Griffin and Barbara Underwood
Petitioner:
Denworth Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez et al v. Riker's Island Slave Complex et al
as 1:2018cv09260
Defendant:
Lawerance Marks, Michael Pompeo, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Douglas Wells, Eugene Moore, Terrence D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlotta v. Heraty et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
James Paul Arlotta
Defendant:
Dave Heraty, Kimberly and Barbara Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Healthcare Distribution Alliance v. Zucker et al
as 1:2018cv06168
Defendant:
HOWARD ZUCKER, Barbara Underwood, Barbara D. Underwood and others
Plaintiff:
HEALTHCARE DISTRIBUTION ALLIANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medlin v. Keyser et al
as 1:2018cv05928
Respondent:
Superintendent William Keyser, NYS Attorney General, Barbara Underwood and others
Petitioner:
George Medlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCoy v. Underwood
as 1:2018cv03507
Respondent:
Barbara Underwood
Petitioner:
Lathaniel McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
