Cases 21 - 30 of 344
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04893
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the San Diego Association of Governments, acting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Dechirico et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00677
Defendant:
Square Inc., Robinhood Markets Inc., Alpaca Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Palmer, Dan Dechirico and Angel Guzman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant:
Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor:
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 20-1987
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David Klusendorf, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Bank Dublin PLC, formerly known as Bear Stearns Bank PLC, Portigon/WestLB AG, Credit Suisse International and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BBA Libor, Ltd., Credit Suisse Group AG, Lloyds Bank PLC, FKA Lloyds TSB Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
