Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Coleman v. Nixon (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Dwight R. Coleman, Robert Earl Jackson Little, Jason Daniels and others
Defendant:
Larry Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Barrett et al (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2021cv00307
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
Barry Barrett and Staton Correctional Facility
Consolidated Defendant:
Michael Borowicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maling v. Laska et al
as 4:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Kevin Demerin, Mitchell Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Dave Gipan Maling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Tammy R. Garrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, William Miller, Tommy Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
David Gams, Nurse Chappel, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dillard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Arnetra Smith
Defendant:
Cynthia Dillard, Donald Campbell, Bill Wynne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Woods et al
as 4:2014cv02090
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barrett
Defendant:
Michael Woods and Matt Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewer v. Administration of Tutwiler A.D.O.C. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tammy Brewer
Defendant:
Administration of Tutwiler A.D.O.C., Bobby Barrett, Gwendolyn Terrance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Woods et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barrett
Defendant:
Micheal Woods and Matt Pete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Corizon et al
as 5:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Terry Davis
Defendant:
Corizon, Stubbs, Barrett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
