Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ebersole v. Lex Co Public Defenders Office ET AL et al
as 3:2022cv03884
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Ebersole, Anthony Scott Ebersole and Tony Ebersole
Defendant:
Lex Co Public Defenders Office ET AL, Lex Co Solicitors Office ET AL, Lex Co Sheriffs Dept ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Stone v. York County et al
as 0:2021cv02015
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barrett Stone
Defendant:
York County, McCee, Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Davis et al
as 5:2021cv01763
Defendant:
Lt Davis, Capt Witherspoon, Capt McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Bragg
as 6:2019cv00450
Petitioner:
Tauvaris Eugene Barrett
Respondent:
M Travis Bragg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Boxx v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Thomas McDonald Boxx, Jr
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department , Anthony Kevin Russ , Roland Christopher Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Betts et al
as 3:2017cv01672
Plaintiff:
Jable Athel Maxwell
Defendant:
David Bruce Betts, Tivis Colley Sutherland, IV, Bradley Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Incumaa v. Stirling et al
as 9:2017cv01608
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Kenyatta Incumaa
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Sandara Barrett and Barton Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. USA
as 4:2017cv01062
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Christopher Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sarratt v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv03486
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sarratt
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P Stirling and Sandra R Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
