Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Sonsini v. Lebanon County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv02232
Defendant:
Lebanon County Pennsylvania, Jamie Woglemoth, Dr. Pevin Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Ronaldo John Sonsini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2019cv05205
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHARPIRO and others
Petitioner:
LEROY A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Barrett et al
as 5:2019cv04922
Defendant:
BCJS, THE COUNTY OF BERKS, Berks Sheriffs Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bailey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCracken v. Fulton County et al
as 3:2019cv01063
Defendant:
Fulton County Deputy Sheriff John Doe # 1-5, Trooper James Dountas, Corporal Ellis Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick McCracken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CAVALLO et al
as 5:2019cv01005
Defendant:
AMBER MOLL, UPTOWN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, RDG PA, OFFICER MATTHEW CAVALLO and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunsil v. Wolf et al
as 1:2019cv00386
Defendant:
D.O.C. Secre. John E. Wetzel, Governor Thomas Wolf and D.O.C. Dpty. Secre. Shirley Moore-Smeal
Plaintiff:
Barrett S. Tunsil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fahs v. Swift et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Dillan C. Fahs
Defendant:
Gerald Swift, Alicia, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00385
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARRETT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07630
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANCIS BARRETT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
