Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Anders et al v. CrossFirst Bank et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Larry K. Anders and Nesa Anders
Defendant:
CrossFirst Bank, Mike Rumfield and Dan Barringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barringer Landscapes, Inc. v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota et al
as 1:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Barringer Landscapes, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota, John Carpenter and Devah Adjusting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Whittington v. Bonsai, Jr. et al
as 4:2021cv03220
Plaintiff:
Bert W. Whittington
Defendant:
Kirk Wayne Bonsai, Jr., Sherman Eagleton, Issac Villareal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Sharpless v. Wilkins III
as 4:2016cv00594
Plaintiff:
Paul Sharpless and Lela Chavis
Defendant:
S. John Wilkins III and Barringer-Knoll Community Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hernandez et al v. Barringer-Knoll Community Association, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02165
Plaintiff:
David S. Hernandez and William L. Comstock
Defendant:
Barringer-Knoll Community Association, Inc. and S. John Wilkins III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Barringer v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02972
Petitioner:
Larry Darnell Barringer
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carolei v. Texas Mesquite Connection et al
as 3:2011cv02811
Plaintiff:
Robert Carolei
Defendant:
Texas Mesquite Connection and Charles Barringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carolei v. Texas Mesquite Connection et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert Carolei
Defendant:
Texas Mesquite Connection and Charles Barringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
