Cases 1 - 10 of 528
Aguilar v. Hallings et al
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Tito Barron Aguilar
Defendant:
C/O Hallings, C/O Sergent William Tate, C/O Senior Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Barron, et al.
as 24-2408
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Defendant:
ARMANDO SOLIS BARRON, MICHAEL NABATI, DOMINIC AHIGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Animal Behavior College, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR COLLEGE, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin III, Patricia Montes Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-1315
Respondent:
HOWARD C. BARRON, Warden, Federal Detention Center Sea Tac, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron and others
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Jeronimo-Barron v. Garland
as 24-1279
Petitioner:
RUBEN JERONIMO-BARRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chapman v. Barron et al
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Roslyn Demetriu Chapman
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and LoAnne Tran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hopkins v. Roughton et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Hopkins
Defendant:
Lt. Roughton, Warden Barron, Collette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
