Cases 1 - 10 of 533
Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Barron, et al.
as 24-2408
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Defendant:
ARMANDO SOLIS BARRON, MICHAEL NABATI, DOMINIC AHIGA and others
Smith v. NuStar Energy L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
NuStar Energy L.P., Bradley Barron, J. Dan Bates and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Animal Behavior College, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR COLLEGE, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin III, Patricia Montes Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Parviz v. Barron, et al.
as 24-1315
Respondent:
HOWARD C. BARRON, Warden, Federal Detention Center Sea Tac, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, H. Barron and others
Petitioner:
MAHSA PARVIZ
Jeronimo-Barron v. Garland
as 24-1279
Petitioner:
RUBEN JERONIMO-BARRON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Barron Lewis
as 24-4079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRON BERNARD LEWIS
Baize v. Physical Disability Board of Review
as 8:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Richard Baize and Richard A. Baize
Defendant:
Physical Disability Board of Review and Erek Barron
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
