Cases 1 - 10 of 37
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2022mc00002
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
The Heartland Group Ventures, LLC, Heartland Production and Recovery LLC, Heartland Production and Recovery Fund LLC and others
Receiver:
Deborah D. Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barron v. Ames
as 1:2020cv00498
Petitioner:
Harry A. Barron
Respondent:
Donald Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barron v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03924
Plaintiff:
Bonnie F. Barron
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01266
Plaintiff:
Lessie Barron
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10798
Plaintiff:
Janet Barron
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron-Palafox et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06965
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barron-Palafox and Cesar Barron-Palafox
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Searcy v. Wimmer
as 2:2014cv15045
Plaintiff:
Webb Barron Searcy, Jr.
Defendant:
David Ballard, Major Rhodes and Sgt. Wimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barron et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15649
Plaintiff:
Debbie A. Barron and Epigmenio Malagon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barron et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14286
Plaintiff:
Jeannie Barron and Don Barron
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
