Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Womble v. Barrows et al
as 4:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Mark Womble
Defendant:
K Barrows and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrows v. Collins et al
as 5:2018cv05195
Defendant:
Deputy Self, Deputy Rex, Deputy Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Trent Barrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Barrows et al
as 4:2018cv00298
Defendant:
Joel Barrows, Ross Barlow, Iowa Department of Public Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Raul V Ruiz, Jr
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Moss v. Corizon CMS, et al
as 15-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John T. Moss
Defendant - Appellee:
Corizon CMS, Medical provider, Arkansas Department of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction, State Prison, Corizon, Inc. and others
John Moss v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 15-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John T. Moss
Defendant - Appellee:
Corizon, Inc., formerly known as Correctional Medical Services, Rick Hallworth, Chief Executive Officer, Corizon, Kevin Bice, Vice President, Corizon and others
Barrows v. Cambran et al
as 5:2013cv05241
Plaintiff:
Marshall D. Barrows
Defendant:
M. Cambran, Jr. and J. Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrows v. Bransetter et al
as 6:2013cv06106
Plaintiff:
Justin Barrow
Defendant:
R. Bransetter and C. Delahunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Corizon CMS et al
as 2:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
John T Moss
Defendant:
Corizon CMS, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrows v. Helder et al
as 5:2013cv05175
Plaintiff:
Marshall Don Barrows
Defendant:
Tim Helder, Washington County Jail and Aron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrows v. Helder et al
as 4:2013cv00479
Plaintiff:
Marshall Don Barrows
Defendant:
Tim Helder, Washington County Jail and Aron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
