Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Clark v. Barrow County Jail
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Barrow County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrow-Rivas v. USA Carship Inc.
as 2:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Barrow-Rivas
Defendant:
USA Carship Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
NIX v. BARROW COUNTY
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
CORTNEY NIX
Defendant:
BARROW COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIX v. BARROW COUNTY
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
CORTNEY NIX
Defendant:
Barrow County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUGELMAN v. BARROW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANNE KUGELMAN
Defendant:
Barrow County Jail, Auburn Police Department, Gwinnett County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KUGELMAN v. BARROW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANNE KUGELMAN
Defendant:
BORROW COUNTY JAIL, AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT, GWINNETT COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Richmond County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bertina Renae Brunson Mealing Dalton and Bertina R. Dalton
Defendant:
Pen Fed, Truist, Richmond County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SCHILTZ et al
as 2:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
JASPER R ADAMS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SCHILTZ, BARROW COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and Winder Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SCHILTZ et al
as 5:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
JASPER R ADAMS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE JAMES SCHILTZ, BARROW COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and WINDER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
