Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. White
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Shcorey Lashawn Ross
Defendant:
Barry White
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Reeves et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Barry Wells
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Mississippi Attorney General, Pike County DA Dee Bates and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Hinds County, Ms. et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Barry Wallace
Defendant:
Hinds County, Ms. and Tyree Jones
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowan v. White
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Romono McGowan
Defendant:
Barry White
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
White v. White et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael Shannon White
Defendant:
Barry White and Clarke County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eubanks v. Bridgforth
as 3:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Diane Eubanks
Defendant:
Barry Bridgforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd v. Spencer et al
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Barry Spencer, James Glisson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
