Cases 1 - 10 of 195
BAIZE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
BARRY DEAN BAIZE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ryder v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Barry Allen Ryder
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Schultz v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Barry Schultz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
JONES et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
ALEX JONES, ALICIA GILLEN, ALYSON MCGILL and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCCLENDON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00865
Plaintiff:
ALANA MCCLENDON, CASEY OXENDINE, DENISE PARKER MOORE and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Barry v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01447
Plaintiff:
Richard Barry
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bhavsar v. Potere et al
as 3:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Spartan Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Matthew Potere, Barry Edinburg, Rodney Yoder and others
Suddreth v. Asplundh Tree Experts, LLC
as 3:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Barry Suddreth
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Experts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
