Cases 1 - 10 of 244
White v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Barry G. White
Defendant:
Christopher M. Cummings and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Barry v. Perry et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Amadou Barry
Respondent:
Paul Perry and Russell Hott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson et al v. Biomet, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Nola Johnson and Barry Johnson
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc, Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Kyle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jonta Cunningham
Defendant:
Barry Martin McCoy and JHJ Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crichlow v. Clarke et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Alexander Crichlow
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Barry Kanode and others
Mullins v. Martinsville City Police Department et al
as 7:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Barry Paul Mullins
Defendant:
Martinsville City Police Department, Officer Parnell, Officer J.R. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano and Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
