Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Bloom et al v. Capital Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Ene-Tea Bloom, Linda Brooks, Kevin Harden and others
Defendant:
Capital Financial Services, Inc., Capital Financial Holdings, Inc., Gordon Douglas Dihle and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award
Robinson v. Ott et al
as 3:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Shantricia Robinson
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Douglass Ott, SAAG Emily Christine Long, City of Fayetteville, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bloom et al v. Capital Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04666
Defendant:
Gordon Douglas Dihle, Capital Financial Holdings, Inc., Capital Financial Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ene-Tea Bloom, Dorothy Crosbie, Jane Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLLEY v. DOE et al
as 3:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, BART SCOTT and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. v. Richert Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03886
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Richert Funding, LLC , Dwight Richert and Bart Garbrecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick v. Scarlett et al
as 2:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dante G. Frederick
Defendant:
Stephen Scarlett, Stephen D. Kelly, Bart Altman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bart Goff
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Nation v. State of Georgia
as 4:2013cv00041
Petitioner:
Gregory Bart Nation
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
