Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 22-3620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zeavision, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated et al v. ZeaVision LLC
as 4:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and PF Consumer Healthcare 1 LLC
Defendant:
ZeaVision LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv01487
Plaintiff:
Zeavision, LLC
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and PF Consumer Healthcare 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 4:2021cv01352
Plaintiff:
Zeavision, LLC
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 4:2021cv00739
Plaintiff:
Zeavision, LLC
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00072
Defendant:
PF Consumer Healthcare 1 LLC and Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Zeavision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mabry et al v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00764
Plaintiff:
Kathryn E Mabry and Jennifer Sineni
Defendant:
Coopervision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Lindsay v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 4:2008cv00470
Plaintiff:
Connie Lindsay
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ridgeway v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 4:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Tina Ridgeway
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tan et al v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 0:2007cv02801
Plaintiff:
James Tan and Sheila Tan
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
