Cases 1 - 10 of 13
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC. v. BASF SE et al
as 2:2018cv01427
Defendant:
BASF CORP., BASF SE, MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: DIISOCYANATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018mc01001
In Re:
IN RE: DIISOCYANATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
TRI-ISO TRYLINE, LLC, BRYN HILL INDUSTRIES, INC., RHINO LININGS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
COVESTRO AG, WANHUA CHEMICAL US HOLDING, INC., BASF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC. v. BASF SE et al
as PAE/2:18-cv-02958
Plaintiff:
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC.
Defendant:
BASF SE , BASF CORP. , BAYER AG and others
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC. v. BASF SE et al
as 2:2018cv02958
Defendant:
BASF CORP., BASF SE, MCNS POLYURETHANES USA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EMMA CHEMICALS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIECZENIK V BAYER CORP
as 11-1153
Defendant-Appellee:
Abbott Laboratories, Bayer Cropscience (New Jersey) Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
PIECZENIK V BAYER CORP
as 11-1121
Defendant-Appellee:
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Allergan USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
George Pieczenik
Bayer Materialscience, LLC v. Zomax, Inc.
as 2:2009mc00013
Plaintiff:
Bayer Materialscience, LLC
Defendant:
Zomax, Inc.
BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC. v. LOGIC GENERAL, INC.
as 2:2008mc00356
Plaintiff:
BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC.
Defendant:
LOGIC GENERAL, INC.
JELD-WEN, INC. et al v. DECKER INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008mc00191
Plaintiff:
JELD-WEN, INC.
Defendant:
DECKER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Movant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC., JOHN PERRY and others
IMMERMAN v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
RICHARD IMMERMAN
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER AG, BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
