Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EVANS v. GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2018cv00203
Defendant:
GAINESVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, MICHELLE BEAMS and PAMELA DAVIS
Plaintiff:
KIMYETTA EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Abercrombie, Jr. v. Trey Beam
as 17-13930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT F. ABERCROMBIE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TREY BEAM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC et al v. WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC , DORIS BEAM , JAMES HOPSON and others
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA , SARA COMANDER , WILLIAM CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cepull v. Spalding County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County Sheriff's Department , Wendell Beam , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannon v. Gibson et al
as 3:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Susan Amanda Bohannon
Defendant:
David Gibson, Wendell Beam and Spalding County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
