Cases 1 - 10 of 635
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Jemmott et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Alene Elene Beasley
Defendant:
Sherlan Stanley Jemmott, J&J Trucking Enterprises, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Beasley Media Group, LLC, et al v. FCC, et al
as 24-10535
Petitioner:
BEASLEY MEDIA GROUP, LLC and TRI-STATE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Ronald Beasley, II
as 24-10506
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD ANTHONY BEASLEY, II
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dennis Long
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, DW McFarland, Lt. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beasley
as 1:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Jaramus Sharrod Jackson
Respondent:
Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MCKISSIC v. RAWLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
C RAWLING, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. BEASLEY et al
as 6:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JEROME JACKSON and Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, M.D. John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
