Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
C.M. et al v. Beaverton School District 48J et al
as 3:2017cv01662
Defendant:
Beaverton School District 48J, Beaverton School District Board, Vice Principal Shawn Davitt and others
Plaintiff:
C. M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vrooman v. Garrett et al
as 3:2017cv00602
Defendant:
Beaverton Police, Beaverton School District and City of Beaverton and all person to be named, Pat Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Charles Vrooman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marcovich et al v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2014cv01892
Defendant:
Beaverton School District, City of Beaverton, Ryan Garbutt and others
Plaintiff:
Emil Marcovich and Tatiana Marcovitch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
