Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
American International Group UK Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: American International Group UK Limited, W.R. Berkley Syndicate Management Limited, HCC International Insurance Company PLC and others
Defendant: Eaton Corporation and Sensata Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Beazley Furlonge Ltd v. Mainfreight Inc
as 3:2021cv00517
Defendant: Mainfreight, Inc. and Mainfreight Inc
Plaintiff: Beazley Furlonge Ltd. and Beazley Furlonge Ltd
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Rialto Pockets, Inc., et al v. Beazley Underwriting Limited, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-55196
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENTUCKY HOSPITALITY VENTURE, LLC, PENN AVE HOSPITALITY, LLC, INLAND RESTAURANT VENTURE I, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: BEAZLEY UNDERWRITING LIMITED
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON, INCLUDING BEAZLEY FURLONGE LTD
Maradiaga v. Adem et al
as 2:2021cv00257
Defendant: Ibrahim Adem, Bayer Transportation Company, Inc., Lloyd America Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court: Lloyd's America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Esdras Maradiaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Riverside v. Bird Rides, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02663
Plaintiff: City of Riverside, a California charter city and municipal corporation and City of Riverside
Defendant: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, INCLUDING BEAZLEY FURLONGE, LTD. for and on behalf of LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2623 AND BEAZLEY FURLONGE LTD. for and on behalf of LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 06, Bird Rides, Inc., a Delware corporation, d/b/a Bird, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rialto Pockets, Inc. et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Including Beazley Furlonge LTD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv07709
Plaintiff: Penn Ave Hospitality, LLC, Washington Management, LLC, The Oxnard Hospitality Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Including Beazley Furlonge LTD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Type: Contract Insurance
Beazley Furlonge Ltd. v. MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03354
Defendant: MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
Plaintiff: Beazley Furlonge Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 mc
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56102
Defendant / Appellant: SWISS RE INTERNATIONAL SE ZURICH, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday and LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al
as 19-56027
Defendant / Appellee: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Dickstein Shapiro LLP, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-55502
Defendant / Appellee: DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, including Brit UW Limited for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2987, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 2623, Beazley Furlonge Ltd. for and on behalf of Lloyds Syndicate 0623, Faraday, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?