Cases 1 - 10 of 1,180
Columbia Energy & Environmental Services Inc v. Bechtel National Inc
as 4:2022cv05097
Plaintiff:
Columbia Energy & Environmental Services Inc
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv05020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Bechtel National Inc et al
as 4:2018cv05159
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc and Mission Support Alliance LLC
Plaintiff:
Donald Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall II v. Bechtel National, Inc.
as 4:2018cv05112
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Plaintiff:
Curtis W Hall II and Curtis W Hall, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Bechtel National Inc et al
as 4:2018cv05101
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc and AECOM
Plaintiff:
Walter E Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 5851
IONEX Research Corporation v. Bechtel National Inc
as 4:2018cv05086
Plaintiff:
IONEX Research Corporation
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AREVA Federal Services LLC v. Bechtel National Inc
as 4:2017cv05182
Plaintiff:
AREVA Federal Services LLC
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AREVA Federal Services LLC v. Bechtel National Inc
as 4:2017cv05183
Plaintiff:
AREVA Federal Services LLC
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
n v. The Lambert Firm PLC, et al
as 17-35844
Intervenor - Appellant:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, GAP, PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT, INC., POGO and CURTIS HALL, putative intervenor
Appellee:
THE LAMBERT FIRM PLC, Former Counsel for Gary Brunson
Defendant - Appellee:
BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC., BECHTEL CORPORATION, URS CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.