Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pittman v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv01935
Petitioner:
Emanuel V Pittman
Respondent:
Anthony Young, Becky R. Lucero, Colorado Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettigrew v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN ALEXANDER PETTIGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director, SUSAN JONES, Warden, LARRY REED, Warden and others
McMurtry v. Beatty, et al
as 12-1124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA NICHOLE BEATTY, MARK YURKY, CELESTE M. QUINONES and others
McMurtry v. Beatty et al
as 1:2011cv02459
Plaintiff:
Gregg Philip McMurtry
Defendant:
Amanda Nichole Beatty, Mark Yurky, Celeste M. Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettigrew v. Zavaras, et al
as 11-1247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN ALEXANDER PETTIGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, SUSAN JONES, LARRY REED and others
Havens v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00490
Plaintiff:
Darrell Havens
Defendant:
William (I) Johnson , William Johnson , Marks (I) Mantych and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettigrew v. Zavares et al
as 1:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ryan Alexander Pettigrew
Defendant:
Aristedes (I) Zavares, Aristedes Zavares, Susan (I) Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmond v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Edmond
Defendant:
Jeaneene Miller, Allison Sweeney-Hoover, Colorado Board of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv02171
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
