Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Emerson v. Beebe
as 5:2014cv05320
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Emerson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerson v. Beebe
as 4:2014cv00620
Plaintiff:
Tina M Emerson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodall v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00617
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Woodall, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Mary Fallon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Rantrez Robinson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, John Felts, Shelia Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 3:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers, John Doe #1 & #2, Quorum Court of Marion County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lester v. Bradford Phelps, et al
as 14-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradford J. Phelps, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Attorney General, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Ronald Parker v. Moses Jackson, III
as 14-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
Moses Jackson, III, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
John Wright v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 14-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Kirby Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor, Ruth Whitaker, Senator of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Mr., Arkansas Attorney General and others
Bates v. Beebe et al
as 4:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bates
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Mark Marton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Phelps et al
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
Bradford J Phelps, Marvin Evans, Jr, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
