Cases 1 - 10 of 1,359
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06251
Plaintiff:
Damian C. Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Horton v. Bell
as 24-1127
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN HORTON
Respondent:
EARL BELL, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bell v. Weinreb Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Bell
Defendant:
Weinreb Management LLC and Jacobe Weinreb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Bernice Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Semple, Arone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evolution Fast Food General Partnership v. HVFG, LLC
as 24-948
Plaintiff:
EVOLUTION FAST FOOD GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a California general partnership and EVOLUTION FAST FOOD ONE, LP
Defendant:
HVFG, LLC, a New York limited liability company and LA BELLE FARM, INC., a New York corporation
Gridley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Alec Gridley
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rene v. Mustafa
as 24-936
Plaintiff:
DIANA RENE and BELLS NURSES REGISTRY & EMPLOYMENT AGENCY INC.
Defendant:
M.D. TANZIA MUSTAFA, personally, M.D. EJIKE ONUOGU, personally, M.D. TAHIRA N. SIAL, personally and others
Not Yet Classified:
BRUNSWICK HOSPITAL CENTER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
