Cases 1 - 10 of 2,524
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BELL v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
JOYCE BELL
Defendant:
THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. BELL, JR.
as 2:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a/ AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Respondent:
BILL BELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MITCHELL v. R. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JAMIR MITCHELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN and LIEUTENANT BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
