Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Bell v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03881
Petitioner:
Dequarn Markeyth Bell
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Merten et al
as 0:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
Thomas Louis Bell, Jr
Defendant:
Justin Merten, Charles Storlie, David Menter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ogburn-Bell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Lynette D. Ogburn-Bell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Kelso v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry G Kelso
Defendant:
3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Bell v. Show-Rite Feeds
as 0:2023cv03008
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith F. Bell
Defendant:
Show-Rite Feeds
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bell v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02237
Petitioner:
April N. Bell
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In the Matter of the Complaint of Craig Lade, Owner of the Motor Vessel RIVER BELLE for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability
as 0:2023cv01859
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Craig Lade, Owner of the Motor Vessel RIVER BELLE for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability
Claimant:
Greg Greene, John Haugum, Jake Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30505 Exoneration, Limitation of Liability
Beck et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anjaletta Beck, Arnaldo Santiago, Robert Jerome Taylor and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Bell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00921
Plaintiff:
John Bell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
