Cases 21 - 30 of 470
LABOA et al v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
JOHN LABEA, MACKS BELL, CHRISTOPHER HURLEY and others
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bell et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2022cv01024
Plaintiff:
Michael Bell and Denise Bell
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Mike Scopelitis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Bell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BELL v. FAST TRACK PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC
as 1:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
TINA BELL
Defendant:
FAST TRACK PHYSICAL THERAPY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bell v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ray L Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Gladieux and Allen County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. RULE
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
RANDALL KIRK BELL
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
