Cases 61 - 70 of 114
Bell v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Bell
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Katherine Kendrigan, Mary Kuhnmuench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy, Wayne v. O'Connell, Shaun et al
as 3:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Murphy
Defendant:
Shaun O'Connell , Amy Bell , Bill Lazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2012cv01059
Plaintiff:
William Bell
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Milwaukee Child Support
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc. v. Public Service Commission Of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2012cv00751
Plaintiff:
Transcom Enhanced Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Public Service Commission Of Wisconsin, Phil Montgomery, Eric Callisto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Bell, Rebecca v. Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00688
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bell
Defendant:
Universal Hospital Services, Inc. and Universal Hospital Services Surgical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Boyd v. Wisconsin Bell Inc
as 1:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Boyd
Defendant:
Wisconsin Bell Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Bell v. Clarke
as 2:2012cv00895
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamont Bell
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Gilliam et al
as 2:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamont Bell
Defendant:
Lashonda Gilliam and Shontianna Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neri, Quincy v. Pinckney Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Quincy M. Neri
Defendant:
Pinckney Holdings, LLC, Linda Hughes, John Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bell v. Karshen et al
as 2:2012cv00714
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamont Bell
Defendant:
Erin M Karshen and David Borowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
