Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Blake v. Lundquist et al
as 1:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christen Whitney Blake
Defendant:
Carl Lundquist, Steven Hernandez, Ben Peyerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Latham v. Municipality of Anchorage
as 3:2013cv00066
Petitioner:
Ben Latham
Respondent:
Municipality of Anchorage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kurka v. John Probst et al
as 3:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Walter J. Kurka
Defendant:
John Probst , Depart. of Law and Ben Jaffa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ben J. Latham
Defendant:
Dan A. Sullivan, Dennis A. Wheeler and Dennis P. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latham v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ben J. Latham
Defendant:
Joe Schmidt and John Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latham v. Palin et al
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Ben Latham
Defendant:
Sarah Palin and Talis Colberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Geo Group et al
as 3:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ben Davis
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Rachael Hurt and Alaska Dept of Corr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosemore v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 3:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Ben E. Rosemore
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints , Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and Jacob D. Eliason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
