Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Green v. Anderson
as 3:2023cv00668
Petitioner:
Albert Leroy Green, Jr.
Respondent:
Ben Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friday v. Carver et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Ben Carver, FNU Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOSCO v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
SANTINO DOMINICK BOSCO, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, GULYAS and BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Andre David Williams
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Ben Carver and Keven R. Chung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Friday v. Carver et al
as 5:2023ct03140
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Warden Ben Carver, Asst. Warden Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheeks v. Carver
as 3:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Cheeks
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
