Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Shack v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00426
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie Jones, Benard Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Shack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery v. Derby et al
as 1:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Lt. Benard, Officer English and Sgt. Derby
Plaintiff:
Deangelos Jeffery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Wilson et al (INTAKE 2)
as 2:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Angela Wilson, Cathy Brown, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Dothan Police Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Dothan Police Department, Jason Adkins, Marc Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Borders et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00549
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
M. Borders, Michael Strickland and K. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Cpt. Strickland , Mrs. Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Dominic et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Jones Dominic, Nathaniel Lawson, Shawn Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Benard Mosley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Captain Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Mixon et al
as 2:2008cv01487
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Benard Mixon, James Beachum, D Levert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pinkard v. Melton et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2007cv00735
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Pinkard, Sr.
Defendant:
Adam Melton, Donald Truitt and Benard Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
