Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Freeman v. Westlund, et al.
as 24-2147
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant:
JANE WESTLUND, CARRIE MONTOYA, JOHN WELTY and others
Freeman #050101 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02324
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Justin A Newsome, Diana Curd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Benjamin Freeman v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-16667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director, Director at ADOCRR, J MACADOREY, Complex Warden, D QUINTERO, Deputy Warden at Cibola, Yuma and others
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Macadorey, D Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, Norman Twyford, Unknown MacAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Freeman v. Douglas Ducey, et al
as 22-16090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS DUCEY, DAVID SHINN, Director, ADC, JOE PREFINI, Southern Reginal Operations Director and others
Freeman v. Shinn
as 2:2021cv02089
Petitioner:
Benjamin Freeman
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin Freeman v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, RUVACOBA, counselor at Manzanita unit, CHARLES L. RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, Director, ADC and others
Dayter v. Czerwinski et al
as 9:2020cv01151
Defendant:
Dilon Cody, Officer Zackary Knobloc, Officer Adam Smaldon and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dayter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00287
Defendant:
David Neal, Unknown Pacheco, Nataylie Weizel and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
