Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McElrath v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Damian Cornell McElrath
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Cobb County - GA, U.S. Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Servantes v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv02690
Petitioner:
Yony Ander Bennet Servantes
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Deputy Warden Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennet v. Ewing et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Summer Nicole Bennet
Defendant:
Cody Nelson Ewing and Quincy Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05304
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Profitt v. Commissioner et al
as 6:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Sst Paret, Com Brad, Sst Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Ashima Profitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silvey v. The City of Lookout Mountain, Georgia et al
as 4:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Samuel Silvey
Defendant:
The City of Lookout Mountain, Georgia and David Bennet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. City of Dalton, Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Danny Troy Carroll
Defendant:
City of Dalton, Georgia, Dalton Police Department, M. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eccles v. Jenkins Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eccles
Defendant:
Jenkins Correctional Facility, Ralph Kemp and Bennet Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
