Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Donald Trump v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 21-5254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his capacity as the 45th President of the United States
Defendant / Appellee:
Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack On The United States Capitol and others
Amicus Curiae:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Virginia Canter, Richard Painter and others
Waldron v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Waldron
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Bennie G Thompson, Elizabeth L Cheney and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Bundren Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
John Eastman v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 22-56013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN C. EASTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol; Rayburn House Office Building, 2466, Washington, DC 20515, SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6 ATTACK ON THE US CAPITOL and CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY, 1 University Dr. Orange, CA 92866
Vos v. United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol et al
as 2:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Robin J Vos
Defendant:
United States House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol and Bennie G Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Trump v. Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol et al
as 9:2022cv81758
Plaintiff:
Donald J Trump
Defendant:
Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
STONE et al v. SCHIFF et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
ROGER J. STONE, JR., Drake Ventures and DRAKE VENTURES, LLC
Defendant:
ADAM B. SCHIFF, NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Michael Ward, et al v. Bennie Thompson, et al
as 22-16473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. WARD, Dr., D.O., husband, KELLI WARD, Dr., D.O., wife and MOLE MEDICAL SERVICES PC, an Arizona Professional Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE JANUARY 6TH ATTACK ON THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL, a committee of the United States House of Representatives and T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Friess v. Thompson et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Katherine Friess
Defendant:
Bennie G. Thompson, Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol and AT & T
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Taylor Budowich, et al v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 22-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Taylor Budowich
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Conservative Strategies, Inc., a California for profit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Pelosi, in her official capacity as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Bennie G. Thompson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol, Elizabeth Cheney, in her official capacity as a Member of the United States House of Representatives and others
MASTRIANO v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv02657
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS V MASTRIANO and DOUGLAS V. MASTRIANO
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
