Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HOPSON v. RAINEY et al
as 4:2013cv00084
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeAndre Hopson v. Ruth Spencer, et al
as 13-5571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH SPENCER, COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
HOPSON v. BERRY et al
as 4:2013cv00045
Defendant:
BENNY BERRY, CHARLIE CUNNINGHAM, DENETRA GATES and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. Hopson et al
as 3:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Goverment of Kentucky, Robert Klienfield, Adam Solinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Aguair Law Office et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Aguair Law Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Weinburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Spencer et al
as 3:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Ruth Spencer, Commonwealth Attorneys Office, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Hopson v. Briesher et al
as 3:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Dendre Hopson
Defendant:
Steve Briesher, Ron Smith, Kentucky Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Shakes et al
as 3:2012cv00722
Plaintiff:
Deandre Hopson
Defendant:
James Shakes, Interchange Law Offices, Frank Mascagni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Berry et al
as 3:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Deandre Hopson
Defendant:
Bennie Berry, Benny Lightsey, Recole Oneal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOPSON v. ORAL SURGUREY AND MAXILLOFACIAL GROUP et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Defendant:
SAM AGUAIR, AUTO-SMART, MIKE BENNET and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
