Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MCCORMICK v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 3:2023cv12262
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C MCCORMICK
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORPORATION PARTNER AND PARENT COMPANY CENTURION, RICKY D DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Bernard C. McCormick
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Corporation Partner and Parent Company Centurion, Ricky D. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard McGeeIn re: Bernard McGee
as 22-11254
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD C. MCGEE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
ENOE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46763
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C ENOE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernard McGeeIn re: Bernard McGee
as 20-12503
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD C. MCGEE
WILLIAMS v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv01704
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan et al v. Hillbilly Haulin' LLC et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 2:2018cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bernard C. Morgan, Jr. and Nakeita S. Morgan
Defendant:
Hillbilly Haulin' LLC , Jason L. Arnett and Alfa Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Bernard McGee
as 17-14982
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD C. MCGEE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Bernard McGee v. Secretary, Department of Corr.
as 17-14313
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD C. MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In re: Bernard McGee
as 17-13918
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD C. MCGEE
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
