Cases 1 - 10 of 27
GRAHAM v. LUKE et al
as 7:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Sheriff RAY PAULK, BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA, WAYNE LUKE and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 7:2018cv00083
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC and others
Plaintiff:
BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANN v. HEATH
as 7:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALAN MANN, JR
Defendant:
ANTHONY HEATH, JEREMY MARQUEZ, KYLE LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 7:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHAKUR ALI
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, HAROLD W CLARKE, RONALD MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CELESTINE v. NASHVILLE BERRIEN COUNTY NURSING HOME, et al.
as 7:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
BETTY CELESTINE
Defendant:
NASHVILLE BERRIEN COUNTY NURSING HOME, GOLDEN LIVING NURSING HOME and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hooks v. Berrien County, Georgia et al
as 7:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
JIMMY KYLE HOOKS
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA and ANTHONY HEATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMEY v. BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MICHELLE SUMMEY
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA, TIFT COUNTY GEORGIA, ISRAEL TIMOTHY RUTLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANCIL et al v. ENIGMA GEORGIA et al
as 7:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
HIEDI MANCIL and ANTHONY MANCIL
Defendant:
ENIGMA GEORGIA, NASHVILLE GEORGIA , BERRIEN COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
