Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Perez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05602
Defendant:
William Wickware, Unknown Palomino, Dustin Aven and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crago #115357 v. Pitz
as 2:2019cv04532
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Pitz, Berry Larson and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv04425
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Alfred Ramos, Unknown Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven McCormick and Jody McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Palomo #149379 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02314
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Unknown Parties, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
George Palomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barrera v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv01319
Defendant:
Unknown Coscareli, Rebecca Hodges, Christopher J Marak-Durand and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Granillo Barrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson #264068 v. Larson
as 3:2018cv08323
Respondent:
Berry Larson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Kazuhiko Matsumoto Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joyce #159473 v. Larson et al
as 2:2018cv01311
Petitioner:
Justin Joyce
Respondent:
Berry Larson , Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry DeYoung v. Berry Larson, et al
as 18-15739
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY DEAN DEYOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
BERRY LARSON, Warden, CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
DeYoung #042165 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00341
Petitioner:
Larry Dean DeYoung
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Berry Larson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Requena v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. REQUENA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, SAM CLINE, BERRY LARSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
