Cases 21 - 30 of 191
Cornell v. City of Douglasville et al
as 1:2021cv05110
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Cornell
Defendant:
City of Douglasville, Douglas County Public Defender's, Douglasville City Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEST v. MARSDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
LONDON ROZIER BEST
Defendant:
ETHAN MARSDEN, ENRIQUE RIVERA, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Best Smoothie Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04402
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Best Smoothie Inc. and Jean Victome
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Fears et al v. Hitts
as 1:2021cv02171
Plaintiff:
Eric Fears, Bless by the Best Yeah Yeah, LLC and Eric Antonio Fears
Defendant:
John C. Hitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fears et al v. DeKalb County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2021cv02170
Plaintiff:
Eric Fears, Bless by the Best, Yeah Yeah, LLC and Eric Antonio Fears
Defendant:
John C. Hitts and DeKalb County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Savannah Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00108
Defendant:
John Best, Savannah Police Department, Roy Mintor and others
Plaintiff:
Gerard Joseph Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
English v. Coleman et al
as 5:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. Hammock, Officer Barkeley, Officer Spiers and others
Plaintiff:
James R. English, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Best Way Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00294
Defendant:
National Interstate Insurance Company, Best Way Express, Inc. and Chad E. Morehead
Plaintiff:
Walter Gregory Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alston v. BestBuy.com, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv05276
Plaintiff:
Sheila Alston
Defendant:
John Doe, BestBuy.com, LLC, Best Buy Store Number 000776 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
