Cases 1 - 10 of 40
SHEPHERD v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Susan Shepherd, as administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Shepherd
Defendant:
Giles Wright, BALDWIN BOROUGH, BRENTWOOD BOROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JUVENILE 'VR' v. MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
JUVENILE 'VR'
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF TIMOTHY O'CONNOR and DETECTIVE JOELLE DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PASCH-CLAMP et al v. LOWER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2020cv04023
Plaintiff:
Georgeanne -Pasch Clamp, Richard Clamp and GEORGEANNE PASCH-CLAMP
Defendant:
Lower Mount Bethel Township, BARRY ISETT & ASSOCIATES, INC. and JOHN DUCUSATIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS v. MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK et al
as 2:2020cv00479
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF BETHEL PARK, ROBERT FASSINGER and TIMOTHY O'CONNER
Plaintiff:
JEROME THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
